<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>That&#039;s Profound &#187; Intellectual Property</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thatsprofound.com/category/intellectual-property/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thatsprofound.com</link>
	<description>Profound legal stories!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:40:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Pirate Bay may be subject to multiple intellectual property law suits</title>
		<link>http://www.thatsprofound.com/pirate-bay-intellectual-property-copyrights-law-suits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thatsprofound.com/pirate-bay-intellectual-property-copyrights-law-suits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thatsprofound.com/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The verdict represents a change in legislation regarding the <a href="http://www.ferguslegalip.com" target="_blank">copyright infringement</a> that the men were convicted of conduct for others to break the law, rather than breaching copyright they themselves. Until yesterday, prosecutors have acted against sites such as Napster, which allowed copyright.</p>
<p>According to a <a href="http://www.ferguslegalip.com/attorney-profile/" target="_blank">copyright infringement lawyer</a>, Mark Harding, director of intellectual property at KPMG, said the verdict was a blow across the bow of the sites file sharing. &#8221;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The verdict represents a change in legislation regarding the <a href="http://www.ferguslegalip.com" target="_blank">copyright infringement</a> that the men were convicted of conduct for others to break the law, rather than breaching copyright they themselves. Until yesterday, prosecutors have acted against sites such as Napster, which allowed copyright.</p>
<p>According to a <a href="http://www.ferguslegalip.com/attorney-profile/" target="_blank">copyright infringement lawyer</a>, Mark Harding, director of intellectual property at KPMG, said the verdict was a blow across the bow of the sites file sharing. &#8221; He expects the case to encourage prosecutors across the world, including the United Kingdom has proposed that copyright comes into force, to take a tougher position against the Web sites for sharing files. But cautioned that only a &#8220;radical change&#8221; in the attitude of consumers to download will end the practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thatsprofound.com/pirate-bay-intellectual-property-copyrights-law-suits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
